Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Gender disparity in Canadian Institutes of Health Research funding within neurology
  1. Brendan Tao1,
  2. Chia-Chen Tsai1,
  3. Catherine Wang2,
  4. Amir R Vosoughi3,
  5. Esther Bui4,
  6. Kristine M Chapman5,
  7. Susan Fox4,
  8. Faisal Khosa1,6
  1. 1The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  2. 2McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3University of Manitoba Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  4. 4Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. 5Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  6. 6Department of Radiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Faisal Khosa; fkhosa{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background Despite efforts to advance equity, diversity and inclusion, women face gender-based barriers in research, including in neurology. Compared with men, women are less likely to hold leadership positions and be senior authors. Gender disparities in grant funding within neurology have yet to be investigated. We examine gender disparities in Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) funding for Canadian neurology divisions and departments.

Methods Data on CIHR grant recipients and metrics (grant contribution, duration and quantity) within Canadian neurology divisions and departments between 2008 and 2022 were acquired from the CIHR Funding Decisions Database. Gender identity was determined by a validated application programming interface. Gender-based differences in CIHR grant contribution amount, duration and prevalence within neurology were calculated. Subgroup analysis was conducted for Canadian-licensed neurologists and Project Grant awards.

Results 1604 grants were awarded to Canadian neurology divisions and departments between 2008 and 2022. Compared with men, women received less funding (p<0.0001), shorter grant durations (p<0.0001) and fewer grants (41.5%) annually. Women comprised the minority of recipients (45.5%) and were less likely to be awarded grants (p<0.001) annually relative to men. Differences were consistent in subgroup analyses, except for equal grant durations observed across genders in Project Grant awards.

Conclusion We report gender disparities in CIHR grant funding to Canadian neurology divisions and departments. Women receive lower contribution amounts, shorter grant durations and fewer grants than men. Future recommendations include addressing gender differences and continuing to evaluate CIHR funding to provide equal opportunities for women in research and funding.

  • research
  • career development
  • clinical leadership
  • trainees
  • medical leadership

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • X @KHOSAFAISAL

  • BT and C-CT contributed equally.

  • Contributors BT, C-CT and FK designed the work. BT and C-CT wrote the main manuscript text. CW conducted all data collection. BT conducted the statistical data analysis. ARV, EB, KMC, SF and FK substantively revised the work. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript prior to submission. C-CT is the guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests FK is the recipient of the Vancouver Medical, Dental and Allied Staff Association Scientific Achievement Award (2024) and Michael Smith Health Research BC Award (2023–2028).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.