Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Transforming safety culture in neonatal intensive care teams
  1. Zheng Jing Hu1,
  2. Gerhard Fusch1,2,
  3. Enas El Gouhary3,
  4. Jennifer Twiss3,
  5. Amneet Sidhu3,
  6. Elias Chappell4,
  7. Emmeline Sheehan5,
  8. Zoe el Helou1,
  9. Robert Robson6,
  10. Kemi Salawu Anazodo7,
  11. Lehana Thabane8,
  12. Peter Lachman9,
  13. Salhab el Helou3
  1. 1Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  5. 5Ontario Health West Region, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  6. 6Healthcare System Safety and Accountability, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  7. 7Odette School of Business, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
  8. 8St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  9. 9Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Salhab el Helou; elhelos{at}mcmaster.ca

Abstract

Background Healthcare organisations face widespread challenges in optimising their safety culture, especially amid conflicting stakeholder needs, staffing shortages and increasing acuity of patients. McMaster University Children’s Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit developed a safety culture programme that prioritises the needs of patients, hospital staff and learners altogether.

Methods The safety culture programme and activities revolve around six primary drivers: psychological safety, provider well-being, equity, diversity and inclusion, teamwork and communication, organisational learning and leadership. We describe how these drivers influence safety culture, the ongoing activities being implemented, stakeholder feedback and contextual factors. We evaluated the maturity of our safety culture using the Manchester Patient Safety Framework (MaPSaF) questionnaire.

Results MaPSaF assessments were conducted three times over 4 years. Most domains of safety culture in MaPSaF maintained their position despite COVID-19 while some indicators declined or have been maintained.

Conclusions We provide a framework for implementing a safety culture programme that addresses the needs of diverse stakeholders. Transformation of the safety culture takes time and the failure to improve the patient safety measures over the period may be attributed to rapidly increasing workload and worsening patient acuity. These challenges underscore the imperative of balancing transactional and transformational projects to preserve a safety culture.

  • medical leadership
  • sustainability
  • multi-disciplinary
  • patient involvement
  • learning organisation

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • X @peterlachman

  • Contributors ZJH, GF and SeH drafted the majority of the manuscript. JT, RR, EEG and AS provided leadership on various projects, including teamwork (JT), complex adaptive systems (RR), joy-in-work and psychological safety (EEG and AS). KSA, EC and EEG reviewed the manuscript and also advised our work on equity, diversity, and inclusion. ZeH reviewed the manuscript extensively and provided intellectual content. LT and PL were mentors to ZJH and SeH, respectively, and reviewed the manuscript. The project has been led by SeH.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.