Article Text
Abstract
Background Healthcare organisations face widespread challenges in optimising their safety culture, especially amid conflicting stakeholder needs, staffing shortages and increasing acuity of patients. McMaster University Children’s Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit developed a safety culture programme that prioritises the needs of patients, hospital staff and learners altogether.
Methods The safety culture programme and activities revolve around six primary drivers: psychological safety, provider well-being, equity, diversity and inclusion, teamwork and communication, organisational learning and leadership. We describe how these drivers influence safety culture, the ongoing activities being implemented, stakeholder feedback and contextual factors. We evaluated the maturity of our safety culture using the Manchester Patient Safety Framework (MaPSaF) questionnaire.
Results MaPSaF assessments were conducted three times over 4 years. Most domains of safety culture in MaPSaF maintained their position despite COVID-19 while some indicators declined or have been maintained.
Conclusions We provide a framework for implementing a safety culture programme that addresses the needs of diverse stakeholders. Transformation of the safety culture takes time and the failure to improve the patient safety measures over the period may be attributed to rapidly increasing workload and worsening patient acuity. These challenges underscore the imperative of balancing transactional and transformational projects to preserve a safety culture.
- medical leadership
- sustainability
- multi-disciplinary
- patient involvement
- learning organisation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
X @peterlachman
Contributors ZJH, GF and SeH drafted the majority of the manuscript. JT, RR, EEG and AS provided leadership on various projects, including teamwork (JT), complex adaptive systems (RR), joy-in-work and psychological safety (EEG and AS). KSA, EC and EEG reviewed the manuscript and also advised our work on equity, diversity, and inclusion. ZeH reviewed the manuscript extensively and provided intellectual content. LT and PL were mentors to ZJH and SeH, respectively, and reviewed the manuscript. The project has been led by SeH.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.